What are the requirements for such a player? Some other common players could be supported read only as we already did. So an alternative way will be, to select one multi-platform player that suits best and support it seamless. I am afraid the general way is the most difficult approach. Is their a similar standard on Windows or Mac Do you have already made further considerations on this "general way"? Which technology do you want to use? I am afraid it has a leak of performance when we try to use it natively because of its inter process communication. On Linux we could implement a client for the standard MPRIS D-Bus interface org. I have no experience with Banshee on Windows or Mac OSX but at least they are offering alpha/beta-quality technology preview. > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > add mass and advanced tagging capabilites > Development Team, which is subscribed to Mixxx. > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mixxx > report any bug and suggestions to it's project too. > I will star using Banshee more seriously to test it's usability and > synchronized bidirectionally between Mixxx and the audio file on my > I would like to happen the same with tags. But I would like to know your technical opinion about that. > each program), but using only banshee's one and let Mixxx read and This is: not to having two clone databases (one in > In my opinion the best implementation would be to rely completely on > delegate that work to another solid more general project, because these > field for example or other custom one's). > advanced features (like custom tags, in order to be able to create a key Treated natively in Mixxx but do it in a general way. I think we should aim to allow external libraries to be Platform and there is no single external program that is cross platform and just usingīanshee's database as the Mixxx library) is that Banshee is not cross The problem with delegating to an external project (e.g. organization features to Mixxx since it's kind of out of scope of the I agree in general with not spending too much time adding advanced tagging My idea of an ideal solution is an integrated DJing-MediaPlayer-MusicLibrary-Application. What do you think? It it worth going such a way? This would solve many Bugs we have currently on our wishlist, like display cover art, lyrics and last.fm infos. This fact would allow us to merge it with Mixxx. He is compared to Banshee something in its infancy, but it looks veeeery promising. I've also had a brief look to Clementine player. We might provide a Banschee Plugin to manage these Mixxx information within Bnashee as well. One idea might be that Mixxx works entirely with the banshee database.Īll additional information from Mixxx should be stored with a reference to the song in Banschee. I am just working on the integration of the Banshee database in Mixxx. I think it's one part of the open source idea to develop as a community for the best solution, instead of competit with different products doing the same. Its out of the Mixxx focus, to be a media player. I want to listen my music desktop player and organize it for the next gig. My idea of an ideal solution is an integrated DJing-MediaPlay er-MusicLibrary -Application.įor me it is important to manage my music collection in one central place. Unfortunately not focused on the DJ needs. There are several other applications that are suitable for managing music libraries and they are doing a quiet good job. It will ever be a crutch in managing the music library compared to other music management solutions. A crucial question in this topic is: What is the main task of Mixxx?įor my feeling Mixxx focuses clearly the live situations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |